RESEARCH METRICS AFRICA

Researchers with analysis already drafted · Worldwide online

Dissertation statistical review

Check whether your dissertation results support the claims you plan to defend.

Request Independent Statistical Review →Inspect real dataset evidence

THE BUYER PROBLEM

Resolve the decision behind the request.

Mismatch between objectives, tests and reported conclusions can remain hidden until supervisor or examiner review.

HOW THE WORK MOVES

Scope first. Traceable decisions throughout.

  1. Define the institutional support boundary
  2. Review methods and output lineage
  3. Explain required corrections
  4. Reassess the revised candidate

Professional delivery uses the existing canonical project and case workflow. Independent QA and release approval are distinct decisions; unresolved findings remain visible.

What the agreed scope can deliver

01 · DELIVERABLE

Methods/results consistency review

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

02 · DELIVERABLE

Prioritised correction memo

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

03 · DELIVERABLE

Discussion of uncertainty and defensible claims

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

Methods, assumptions and boundaries

Review does not promise graduation, examiner approval or publication. You write and defend your dissertation.

Source values are preserved; changes require documented reasons. Analysis needs a defined outcome, population, design and eligible records. Review may withhold an unsupported test or conclusion.

Read the RMA methodology →

Start with context. Transfer data privately.

The public fit check asks for objectives, stage and constraints. Do not paste participant names, health records, passwords or connector tokens. Access, permitted data, retention and export/deletion arrangements are confirmed before private transfer.

Review data-handling boundaries →

Is this a fit?

For researchers with analysis already drafted who can explain the intended decision, provide authorised evidence and accept transparent limitations.

Outside scope: fabricated data, guaranteed significance, thesis ghostwriting, clinical decision-making or claims of regulatory certification.

Before you start

What does the first enquiry commit me to?

Nothing is charged through the fit-check form. RMA reviews scope and confirms deliverables, exclusions, timing and price in writing.

Will I need a personal or organisation workspace?

Your project uses the existing Personal Research Workspace and the shared RMA account system. A professional service is linked to the canonical case; it does not create a separate portal.

Can you guarantee an outcome or approval?

No. Findings depend on the source data and design. QA checks the agreed evidence and cannot guarantee significance, graduation, grant funding or publication.

Prepare a stronger brief.

Research operations overview · Free research tools · Organisation product tour

Request Independent Statistical Review →