RMResearch Metrics AfricaResearch & data services← NGO audit service

Synthetic case study · NGO & M&E data quality

122 records in.
A decision-ready issue register out.

This transparent demonstration shows how Research Metrics Africa turns a field-data export into prioritised review signals, an analysis gate and a practical corrective-action plan - without overstating what automated checks can prove.

MissingnessDuplicatesRange & logicInterview durationResponse patternsGPS scope

The management question

Can this dataset safely support the next programme decision?

The audit does not begin by hunting for a significant p-value. It begins by asking whether the records, coding, collection controls and available field signals are trustworthy enough for analysis and reporting.

01

What needs correction?

Confirmed structure, range and logic failures enter a documented issue register.

02

What needs context?

Timing, repetition and location patterns remain review signals until the field team validates them.

03

What must wait?

Inferential analysis is withheld when its assumptions fail, protecting the organisation from a misleading conclusion.

Audit result

Signals were prioritised, not sensationalised.

Counts below are screening outputs from synthetic data. Categories may overlap. A flag is a reason to review a record, never an accusation against an enumerator.

15

records with review signals

Queued for human review - not automatic deletion

6

range or logic violations

Check source forms, coding rules and skip logic

2

duration anomalies

Compare with interview context and field logs

3

possible straight-lined interviews

Pattern signal only - not proof of misconduct

ANALYSIS GATE

Planned chi-square test: withheld

Expected-cell assumptions were not met. The responsible output is a documented hold and remediation path - not a forced p-value.

WITHHELD

Corrective action

Every signal is assigned to a decision owner.

A useful audit closes the loop between the record, the rule, the person who can verify it and the action required before the next reporting cycle.

01M&E lead

Confirm indicator definitions and decide which issues are material to reporting.

02Data manager

Review the 15 flagged records against the questionnaire, codebook and cleaning log.

03Field supervisor

Add interview context for timing, repetition or location signals before any conclusion.

04Analyst

Re-run the assumption gate and only release inferential results when the data supports them.

Show, do not just promise

Review the sample report your M&E team can inspect.

The downloadable PDF includes the audit scope, issue register, analysis gate, corrective-action plan, limitations and a sample deliverables checklist. It uses synthetic data and is not presented as a client engagement.