RESEARCH METRICS AFRICA

Researchers seeking explainable R workflows · Worldwide online

R research analysis support

Build an analysis you can inspect, explain and rerun.

Book Research Readiness Clinic →Inspect real dataset evidence

THE BUYER PROBLEM

Resolve the decision behind the request.

A script that only runs on one laptop can fail when paths, package versions or undocumented steps change.

HOW THE WORK MOVES

Scope first. Traceable decisions throughout.

  1. Clarify question and data structure
  2. Prepare reproducible inputs
  3. Review code and assumptions
  4. Package output and explanation

Professional delivery uses the existing canonical project and case workflow. Independent QA and release approval are distinct decisions; unresolved findings remain visible.

What the agreed scope can deliver

01 · DELIVERABLE

Documented scripts and package/session information

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

02 · DELIVERABLE

Source-to-output transformation notes

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

03 · DELIVERABLE

Reviewed estimates, diagnostics and interpretation

Confirm the exact format, accountable reviewer and acceptance criteria in the written scope before work begins.

Methods, assumptions and boundaries

Computational reproducibility depends on accessible data and dependencies. R output is not automatically statistically valid.

Source values are preserved; changes require documented reasons. Analysis needs a defined outcome, population, design and eligible records. Review may withhold an unsupported test or conclusion.

Read the RMA methodology →

Start with context. Transfer data privately.

The public fit check asks for objectives, stage and constraints. Do not paste participant names, health records, passwords or connector tokens. Access, permitted data, retention and export/deletion arrangements are confirmed before private transfer.

Review data-handling boundaries →

Is this a fit?

For researchers seeking explainable r workflows who can explain the intended decision, provide authorised evidence and accept transparent limitations.

Outside scope: fabricated data, guaranteed significance, thesis ghostwriting, clinical decision-making or claims of regulatory certification.

Before you start

What does the first enquiry commit me to?

Nothing is charged through the fit-check form. RMA reviews scope and confirms deliverables, exclusions, timing and price in writing.

Will I need a personal or organisation workspace?

Your project uses the existing Personal Research Workspace and the shared RMA account system. A professional service is linked to the canonical case; it does not create a separate portal.

Can you guarantee an outcome or approval?

No. Findings depend on the source data and design. QA checks the agreed evidence and cannot guarantee significance, graduation, grant funding or publication.

Prepare a stronger brief.

Research operations overview · Free research tools · Organisation product tour

Book Research Readiness Clinic →